Difference between revisions of "Talk:USS Khai Tam"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
If it gets too confusing somewhere, then we can revisit it. But since we can easily link to "STARFLEET" at sfi.org to clarify who we're talking about in a Wiki article, we can avoid any confusion that proper capitalization might try to introduce. --[[User:Reddick|Jon]] 15:29, 19 September 2007 (CDT) | If it gets too confusing somewhere, then we can revisit it. But since we can easily link to "STARFLEET" at sfi.org to clarify who we're talking about in a Wiki article, we can avoid any confusion that proper capitalization might try to introduce. --[[User:Reddick|Jon]] 15:29, 19 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Jon, why doesn't: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Read about more ''Khai Tam'' nicknames [[Category:Khai Tam Nicknames|here]].'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Work? --[[User:Tai|Tai]] 11:03, 20 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:03, 20 September 2007
Yeah, that's how I thought "fictitious" should be spelled, too, but it's not really "ficticious." --Reddick 15:29, 13 September 2007 (CDT)
I'm boycotting that crazy all-caps self-aggrandizing "STARFLEET" thing. I say we just do it as "Starfleet" like any other normal word, eh? --Reddick 15:31, 13 September 2007 (CDT)
I think STARFLEET actually does it in a lame attempt to avoid copyright infringement, but I think it actually does easily separate the club from the Trek organization to save confusion. Your call.
If it gets too confusing somewhere, then we can revisit it. But since we can easily link to "STARFLEET" at sfi.org to clarify who we're talking about in a Wiki article, we can avoid any confusion that proper capitalization might try to introduce. --Jon 15:29, 19 September 2007 (CDT)
Jon, why doesn't:
Read about more Khai Tam nicknames.
Work? --Tai 11:03, 20 September 2007 (CDT)
