Talk:USS Khai Tam - Revision history

Ctoenjes at 06:05, 21 September 2007

2007-09-21T06:05:59Z

Ctoenjes at 05:43, 21 September 2007

2007-09-21T05:43:43Z

Reddick at 17:12, 20 September 2007

2007-09-20T17:12:38Z

Reddick at 17:11, 20 September 2007

2007-09-20T17:11:26Z

Tai at 16:03, 20 September 2007

2007-09-20T16:03:45Z

Reddick at 20:29, 19 September 2007

2007-09-19T20:29:45Z

Reddick at 20:29, 19 September 2007

2007-09-19T20:29:25Z

Tai at 20:40, 13 September 2007

2007-09-13T20:40:35Z

Reddick at 20:31, 13 September 2007

2007-09-13T20:31:46Z

Reddick at 20:29, 13 September 2007

2007-09-13T20:29:28Z

New page

Yeah, that's how I thought "fictitious" should be spelled, too, but it's not really "ficticious."
--[[User:Reddick|Reddick]] 15:29, 13 September 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:05, 21 September 2007
Line 23:		Line 23:

	The Christmas parade float was December of '95 because I was still there... I was give the project and nearly dropped the ball on that one too... will fix. CT		The Christmas parade float was December of '95 because I was still there... I was give the project and nearly dropped the ball on that one too... will fix. CT
		+
		+	A couple of edits to the database of members: Brien Allen was DC of Engineering before me. Also, if this list includes Shuttle Heritage era folks, you need to add Randy Eisner. (He was the one who convinced me to come to a meeting originally).... CT

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:43, 21 September 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:

	P.S. I edited your comment above, because it was placing this talk thread into the nicknames category, too. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 12:12, 20 September 2007 (CDT)		P.S. I edited your comment above, because it was placing this talk thread into the nicknames category, too. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 12:12, 20 September 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+
		+	The Christmas parade float was December of '95 because I was still there... I was give the project and nearly dropped the ball on that one too... will fix. CT

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Jon, why doesn't:
-''Read about more ''Khai Tam'' nicknames [[Category:Khai Tam Nicknames|here]].''
+''Read about more ''Khai Tam'' nicknames here.''
 Work?  --[[User:Tai|Tai]] 11:03, 20 September 2007 (CDT)
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 <nowiki>''Read about more ''Khai Tam'' nicknames [[:Category:Khai_Tam_Nicknames|here]].''</nowiki> --[[User:Reddick|Jon]] 12:11, 20 September 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 20 September 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Work? --[[User:Tai\|Tai]] 11:03, 20 September 2007 (CDT)		Work? --[[User:Tai\|Tai]] 11:03, 20 September 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	The ''[[Category:'' tag is special. It can appear anywhere on the page and still make it down to the bottom, so it was perceived as a categorization, and placed the whole article in the nicknames category. if you want to link to a category you need to place a ''':''' before the Category name to flag it that it is not a categorization, like this:
		+
		+	<nowiki>''Read about more ''Khai Tam'' nicknames [[:Category:Khai_Tam_Nicknames\|here]].''</nowiki> --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 12:11, 20 September 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:03, 20 September 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	If it gets too confusing somewhere, then we can revisit it. But since we can easily link to "STARFLEET" at sfi.org to clarify who we're talking about in a Wiki article, we can avoid any confusion that proper capitalization might try to introduce. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 15:29, 19 September 2007 (CDT)		If it gets too confusing somewhere, then we can revisit it. But since we can easily link to "STARFLEET" at sfi.org to clarify who we're talking about in a Wiki article, we can avoid any confusion that proper capitalization might try to introduce. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 15:29, 19 September 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+
		+	Jon, why doesn't:
		+
		+	''Read about more ''Khai Tam'' nicknames [[Category:Khai Tam Nicknames\|here]].''
		+
		+	Work? --[[User:Tai\|Tai]] 11:03, 20 September 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 19 September 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	I think STARFLEET actually does it in a lame attempt to avoid copyright infringement, but I think it actually does easily separate the club from the Trek organization to save confusion. Your call.		I think STARFLEET actually does it in a lame attempt to avoid copyright infringement, but I think it actually does easily separate the club from the Trek organization to save confusion. Your call.

−	If it gets too confusing somewhere, then we can revisit it. But since we can easily link to "STARFLEET" at sfi.org to clarify who we're talking about in a Wiki article, we can avoid any confusion that proper capitalization might try to introduce.	+	If it gets too confusing somewhere, then we can revisit it. But since we can easily link to "STARFLEET" at sfi.org to clarify who we're talking about in a Wiki article, we can avoid any confusion that proper capitalization might try to introduce. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 15:29, 19 September 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 19 September 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	I think STARFLEET actually does it in a lame attempt to avoid copyright infringement, but I think it actually does easily separate the club from the Trek organization to save confusion. Your call.		I think STARFLEET actually does it in a lame attempt to avoid copyright infringement, but I think it actually does easily separate the club from the Trek organization to save confusion. Your call.
		+
		+	If it gets too confusing somewhere, then we can revisit it. But since we can easily link to "STARFLEET" at sfi.org to clarify who we're talking about in a Wiki article, we can avoid any confusion that proper capitalization might try to introduce.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:40, 13 September 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:

	I'm boycotting that crazy all-caps self-aggrandizing "STARFLEET" thing. I say we just do it as "Starfleet" like any other normal word, eh? --[[User:Reddick\|Reddick]] 15:31, 13 September 2007 (CDT)		I'm boycotting that crazy all-caps self-aggrandizing "STARFLEET" thing. I say we just do it as "Starfleet" like any other normal word, eh? --[[User:Reddick\|Reddick]] 15:31, 13 September 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	I think STARFLEET actually does it in a lame attempt to avoid copyright infringement, but I think it actually does easily separate the club from the Trek organization to save confusion. Your call.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 13 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Yeah, that's how I thought "fictitious" should be spelled, too, but it's not really "ficticious."		Yeah, that's how I thought "fictitious" should be spelled, too, but it's not really "ficticious."
	--[[User:Reddick\|Reddick]] 15:29, 13 September 2007 (CDT)		--[[User:Reddick\|Reddick]] 15:29, 13 September 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	I'm boycotting that crazy all-caps self-aggrandizing "STARFLEET" thing. I say we just do it as "Starfleet" like any other normal word, eh? --[[User:Reddick\|Reddick]] 15:31, 13 September 2007 (CDT)